42Crunch for LLM gateway boundary test

What middleBrick covers

  • Black-box LLM gateway scanning with adversarial prompts
  • Risk scoring from A to F with prioritized findings
  • Supports authenticated scans with header allowlist
  • OpenAPI spec parsing and cross-reference with runtime data
  • CI/CD integration via CLI and GitHub Action
  • Continuous monitoring and diff detection across scans

Overview of LLM Gateway Boundary Testing

An LLM gateway sits in front of language models to enforce guardrails, route requests, and manage authentication. Boundary testing evaluates what an untrusted prompt can cause the gateway to reveal or execute. middleBrick scans this boundary using adversarial prompts designed to probe system instructions, data handling, and tool use without sending destructive payloads.

How middleBrick Approaches LLM Security Testing

The scanner runs black-box checks focused on the gateway surface, not the model internals. It submits text-only prompts aligned to LLM security testing, including system prompt extraction, instruction override attempts, DAN and roleplay jailbreaks, data exfiltration probes, token smuggling, and nested instruction injection. Each probe is non-intrusive and read-only, avoiding any impact on downstream services or models.

Mapping to Standards and Practical Coverage

middleBrick maps findings to OWASP API Top 10 (2023), which covers common risks around prompt injection, data exposure, and unsafe handling of LLM features. The tool helps you prepare for security reviews aligned with SOC 2 Type II controls relevant to access management and auditability. Findings related to unsafe consumption surface issues that support audit evidence for secure AI gateway design.

Integration Friction and Time-to-Value

middleBrick operates as a self-service scanner with minimal integration overhead. You submit a reachable gateway URL, and results appear in under a minute via the dashboard, CLI, or MCP server. There are no agents, SDKs, or code access required, which reduces setup complexity. The scanner enforces domain verification for authenticated scans, ensuring only authorized evaluators test environments that accept credentials.

Limitations and Responsible Use

middleBrick does not perform active exploitation such as SQL injection or command injection, as those lie outside its scope. It does not detect business logic flaws unique to your domain, and it cannot replace a human pentester for high-stakes audits. The tool surfaces findings relevant to gateway security but does not fix, patch, or block identified issues; remediation guidance is provided for further investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can middleBrick test my LLM gateway with authentication?
Yes. Starter tier and above support Bearer, API key, Basic auth, and Cookie authentication. Domain verification is required so only the domain owner can scan with credentials.
Does the scanner send code execution or injection payloads to the gateway?
No. All testing is read-only, and destructive payloads are never sent. The focus is on observing how the gateway handles adversarial prompts.
How are findings related to compliance frameworks presented?
Findings map directly to OWASP API Top 10 (2023). The tool helps you prepare for reviews aligned with SOC 2 Type II and supports audit evidence for secure AI gateway implementations.
Can I integrate middleBrick into CI/CD for gateway security gates?
Yes. The CLI and GitHub Action allow automated scanning, with the option to fail builds when the risk score drops below your defined threshold.