HIGH crlf injectiongrapehmac signatures

Crlf Injection in Grape with Hmac Signatures

Crlf Injection in Grape with Hmac Signatures — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability

Crlf Injection occurs when an attacker can inject a carriage return (CR, \r) and line feed (\n) sequence into an HTTP header or header-derived value. In a Grape API, this risk can intersect with Hmac Signatures when the signature is computed over a header value that is later reflected into another header without proper sanitization. For example, if a request includes a custom header such as X-Request-ID and that value is used both to compute an Hmac signature and to set a downstream response header, an attacker could inject \r\n into the header to smuggle additional headers or commands.

Consider a Grape endpoint that validates an X-Client-Signature header built over selected request headers. If the server reuses the same header value in a Set-Cookie or Location header without sanitization, the injected \r\n can split the header chain and inject a new header, effectively conducting a response splitting attack. Because the Hmac signature is tied to the original header value, an attacker might attempt to manipulate header ordering or casing to bypass naive canonicalization, while the server’s signature verification may still pass if the canonicalization logic does not explicitly reject or normalize CR and LF characters. This mismatch between signature verification and header handling creates a window where an attacker can exploit Crlf Injection even when signatures are in use.

Another scenario involves the use of the X-Forwarded-Proto or similar headers in signature material. If an attacker can introduce \r\n into these values and the server reflects them into other headers or logs, they can manipulate redirection behavior or leak information. Because Grape applications often rely on Hmac Signatures to ensure request integrity, failing to sanitize and normalize header inputs before including them in the signature scope can lead to situations where the signature validates but the resulting behavior is unsafe. The vulnerability is not in the Hmac algorithm itself, but in how header values are normalized, concatenated, and reused across request processing and response generation.

Hmac Signatures-Specific Remediation in Grape — concrete code fixes

To safely use Hmac Signatures in Grape while preventing Crlf Injection, normalize and strictly validate any header value that contributes to the signature or is reflected into other headers. Reject or percent-encode control characters such as \r and \n in header values before they are used in signature computation or header setting. Below is a complete, realistic example that demonstrates canonicalization, signature verification, and safe header setting in a Grape API.

# Gemfile
gem 'grape'
gem 'openssl' # for OpenSSL::HMAC
# app/api/secure_api.rb
require 'grape'
require 'openssl'

class SecureApi < Grape::API
  format :json

  helpers do
    def allowed_header_names
      ['X-Request-ID', 'X-Client-Timestamp', 'X-Content-SHA256']
    end

    def canonicalize_for_signature(request, header_names)
      # Normalize header names to a consistent case and exclude unsafe headers
      header_names.sort.map do |name|
        value = request.get_header("HTTP_#{name.tr('-', '_').upcase}")
        # Reject header values containing CR or LF to prevent injection
        if value&.match?(/[\r\n]/)
          raise Grape::Exceptions::Validation, { message: { header: { name => 'contains invalid characters' } } }
        end
        "#{name}:#{value.to_s.strip}"
      end.join("\n")
    end

    def compute_hmac(secret, data)
      OpenSSL::HMAC.hexdigest('sha256', secret, data)
    end

    def verify_signature!(request)
      secret = ENV.fetch('HMAC_SECRET') { 'development-secret-change-in-production' }
      provided = request.get_header('HTTP_X_CLIENT_SIGNATURE')
      # Build canonical data from allowed headers only
      canonical = canonicalize_for_signature(request, allowed_header_names)
      expected = compute_hmac(secret, canonical)
      unless Rack::Utils.secure_compare(provided.to_s, expected)
        raise Grape::Exceptions::Authentication, 'Invalid signature'
      end
    end
  end

  before { verify_signature! }

  resource :items do
    get do
      { status: 'ok', headers: { 'X-Request-Processed' => 'true' } }
    end
  end
end

In this example, canonicalize_for_signature normalizes header names, sorts them, and rejects any header values containing CR or LF characters before they are included in the signature scope. By raising a validation error when such characters are detected, the API prevents attackers from smuggling additional headers via Crlf Injection. The verify_signature! helper computes the Hmac over the canonical string and uses Rack::Utils.secure_compare to avoid timing attacks. When setting response headers, ensure you do not directly echo unsanitized input; instead, use fixed values or explicitly validated safe values.

Additionally, prefer using symbols or constants for header names to avoid case-insensitive mismatches, and avoid concatenating raw user input into header values. If you must include user input in headers, apply strict allow-lists and encoding (e.g., Base64) rather than trying to sanitize CR and LF manually. These practices reduce the risk of Crlf Injection while preserving the integrity of Hmac Signatures in Grape APIs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does normalizing header values matter for Hmac Signatures and Crlf Injection?
Normalization ensures that canonicalization for the Hmac signature matches the runtime handling of headers. If a header value is canonicalized with stripped whitespace but later used raw and reflects \r\n into another header, the signature may still validate while the behavior becomes unsafe. Rejecting or encoding CR/LF prevents attackers from exploiting mismatches between signature scope and header handling.
Can an attacker bypass Hmac verification by changing header casing or order?
Yes, if canonicalization is inconsistent. To mitigate this, sort header names in a canonical order (e.g., alphabetical), use a consistent case, and exclude unsafe characters before signing. middleBrick scans can help identify inconsistent header handling that may weaken Hmac-based integrity checks.