HIGH cross site request forgerysinatrafirestore

Cross Site Request Forgery in Sinatra with Firestore

Cross Site Request Forgery in Sinatra with Firestore — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in a Sinatra app that uses Google Cloud Firestore arises when an authenticated Firestore session is tied to cookies or headers that the browser automatically sends on cross-origin requests. Without anti-CSRF protections, an attacker can trick a logged-in user’s browser into issuing state-changing Firestore writes through crafted HTML forms or image tags that point to Sinatra routes which mutate data.

Consider a Sinatra route that updates a Firestore document based on user-supplied parameters without verifying request origin:

require 'sinatra'
require 'google/cloud/firestore'

configure do
  set :public_folder, File.join(Dir.pwd, 'public')
  set :views, File.join(Dir.pwd, 'views')
end

firestore = Google::Cloud::Firestore.new

post '/update_profile' do
  user_id = session[:user_id]
  bio = params[:bio]
  # Dangerous: no CSRF check
  firestore.doc("users/#{user_id}").update(bio: bio)
  "Profile updated"
end

If an attacker hosts a page with <form action="https://your-sinatra-app/update_profile" method="POST"><input name="bio" value="Hacked"/></form> and uses JavaScript to auto-submit it, the user’s browser may include session cookies (or an auth token) and the request will succeed from the server’s perspective. Because the Sinatra app trusts the session cookie and does not validate the request source, the attacker can change the user’s Firestore document.

The risk is higher when Sinatra uses cookie-based sessions and does not set SameSite attributes or CSRF tokens. Firestore security rules alone cannot prevent this: rules validate data and identity but not request origin. Therefore, the combination of Sinatra routes that perform writes and browser-managed session cookies creates a CSRF surface that must be mitigated at the application layer.

Another scenario involves forms that embed user-controlled values into Firestore document paths or fields without synchronizer tokens. For example, a form that sends project_id and uses it to update projects/:project_id/settings can be exploited if the attacker can predict or harvest a valid project ID from the victim’s session or public data.

Firestore-Specific Remediation in Sinatra — concrete code fixes

To defend against CSRF in Sinatra with Firestore, apply per-request origin verification and anti-CSRF tokens for any route that mutates Firestore documents. Below are concrete, working examples.

1. Use origin and referer checks for safe methods (defense in depth)

helpers do
  def safe_request?
    allowed_origins = ['https://your-sinatra-app.com']
    origin = request.env['HTTP_ORIGIN']
    referer = request.env['HTTP_REFERER']
    allowed_origins.include?(origin) || (referer && referer.start_with?('https://your-sinatra-app.com'))
  end
end

2. Implement per-session CSRF tokens and require them for writes

helpers do
  def csrf_token
    session[:csrf_token] ||= SecureRandom.base64(32)
  end

  def verify_csrf_token
    halt 403, 'Invalid CSRF token' unless params[:csrf_token] == session[:csrf_token]
  end
end

before do
  content_type :json
end

post '/update_profile' do
  verify_csrf_token
  user_id = session[:user_id]
  bio = params[:bio]
  firestore = Google::Cloud::Firestore.new
  firestore.doc("users/#{user_id}").update(bio: bio)
  { status: 'ok' }.to_json
end

get '/form_page' do
  erb :update_profile, locals: { csrf_token: csrf_token }
end

In your ERB template (views/update_profile.erb), include the token as a hidden field:

<form action="/update_profile" method="POST">
  <input name="bio" type="text" />
  <input name="csrf_token" value="<%= csrf_token %>" />
  <button type="submit">Save</button>
</form>

3. Enforce SameSite cookies and secure flags

configure do
  enable :sessions
  set :session_secret, ENV.fetch('SESSION_SECRET') { 'development_secret_change_in_production' }
  # Rack cookies options can be set via session options if supported by your adapter
end

Ensure your session cookie attributes include SameSite=Lax or SameSite=Strict and in production. In modern Rack/Sinatra setups this is often configured via the session store or middleware; verify using browser dev tools.

4. For API-driven clients, require custom request headers and check Origin

post '/api/update_settings' do
  halt 403 unless request.env['HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH'] == 'XMLHttpRequest'
  halt 403 unless safe_request?
  user_id = session[:user_id]
  settings = JSON.parse(request.body.read)
  firestore = Google::Cloud::Firestore.new
  firestore.doc("users/#{user_id}/settings").set(settings, merge: true)
  { status: 'updated' }.to_json
end

These measures ensure that even if a malicious site can make the user’s browser send requests, they will fail CSRF token or origin checks. Remember that CSRF protection complements, but does not replace, Firestore security rules and least-privilege IAM bindings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Firestore security rules alone prevent CSRF attacks in Sinatra?
No. Firestore security rules validate data and user identity but do not inspect request origins. CSRF must be mitigated in Sinatra with anti-CSRF tokens or strict origin/referer checks.
Is it sufficient to set SameSite cookies without CSRF tokens?
SameSite cookies reduce risk but are not a complete defense. Browsers with relaxed policies or legacy contexts may not enforce SameSite strictly. Combine SameSite with CSRF tokens and origin checks for robust protection.