HIGH information disclosurecockroachdb
Information Disclosure in Cockroachdb
Cockroachdb-Specific Remediation
p>Effective remediation for Cockroachdb information disclosure requires implementing proper error handling, query sanitization, and secure configuration. The first line of defense is centralized error handling that masks sensitive details:
// Secure error handling for Cockroachdb
func queryUsers(ctx context.Context, id string) ([]User, error) {
rows, err := db.QueryContext(ctx, "SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = $1", id)
if err != nil {
// Log detailed error internally
logErrorWithDetails(err, "queryUsers", id)
// Return generic error to client
return nil, errors.New("database query failed")
}
defer rows.Close()
var users []User
for rows.Next() {
var u User
if err := rows.Scan(&u.ID, &u.Name, &u.Email); err != nil {
logErrorWithDetails(err, "scan row")
return nil, errors.New("database error")
}
users = append(users, u)
}
return users, nil
}
Cockroachdb provides built-in features for secure query execution. Use prepared statements and parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection and information disclosure through query structure:
// Secure Cockroachdb query patterns
stmt, err := db.Prepare("SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = $1")
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer stmt.Close()
// Always use parameterized queries
rows, err := stmt.Query(id)
if err != nil {
// Handle error securely
}
Configure Cockroachdb to minimize information disclosure through SQL shell and administrative interfaces:
-- Secure Cockroachdb configuration
SET sql_safe_updates = true;
SET require_secure_defaults = true;
ALTER ROLE admin SET password_expiration = '2030-01-01';
-- Disable information schema access for non-admin users
REVOKE SELECT ON information_schema FROM public;
-- Create least-privilege database user
CREATE USER app_user WITH PASSWORD 'strong_password';
GRANT SELECT ON users TO app_user;
REVOKE ALL ON information_schema FROM app_user;
Implement application-level query result sanitization to prevent timing attacks and information leakage:
// Constant-time response to prevent timing attacks
func checkUserExists(ctx context.Context, id string) bool {
var exists bool
// Use constant-time query
err := db.QueryRowContext(
ctx,
"SELECT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE id = $1)",
id,
).Scan(&exists)
if err != nil {
logErrorWithDetails(err, "checkUserExists", id)
return false
}
return exists
}
For AI/ML applications using Cockroachdb as a vector store, implement strict output filtering and system prompt isolation:
# Secure AI endpoint with Cockroachdb
@app.route('/chat/completions', methods=['POST'])
def secure_chat():
data = request.json
prompt = data.get('prompt', '')
# Filter for SQL injection attempts
if any(keyword in prompt.lower() for keyword in ['select', 'insert', 'delete', 'update']):
return jsonify({
"error": "Invalid request",
"detail": "Query contains restricted keywords"
}), 400
# Query vector store securely
try:
results = db.sql("SELECT response FROM ai_responses WHERE embedding <@ $1 LIMIT 1", [embed_prompt(prompt)])
# Mask any database-related content in response
sanitized_response = re.sub(r'\b(users|tables|select|cockroachdb|cockroach)\b', '[REDACTED]', results[0])
return jsonify({"choices": [{"text": sanitized_response}]})
except Exception as e:
log.error(f"AI query failed: {e}")
return jsonify({"error": "Service unavailable"}), 500
Frequently Asked Questions
How does middleBrick detect information disclosure in Cockroachdb without credentials?
middleBrick performs black-box scanning by sending requests to your API endpoints and analyzing responses for Cockroachdb-specific error patterns, SQL error messages, and database metadata. It tests for SQL injection vulnerabilities that could lead to information disclosure and scans for timing differences that might reveal record existence. The scanner doesn't need database credentials because it tests the application layer where Cockroachdb errors are exposed to users.
What makes Cockroachdb information disclosure different from traditional SQL databases?
Cockroachdb's distributed architecture introduces unique information disclosure risks. Error messages often include node identifiers, cluster IDs, and distributed transaction details that aren't present in traditional databases. The database also provides more detailed error codes and metadata through its SQL shell and administrative interfaces. Additionally, Cockroachdb's automatic retry logic and distributed transaction handling can expose timing information and conflict details that reveal database structure and usage patterns.