Insecure Direct Object Reference in Axum with Basic Auth
Insecure Direct Object Reference in Axum with Basic Auth — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability
Insecure Direct Object Reference (BOLA/IDOR) occurs when an API exposes internal object references such as numeric IDs or UUIDs and uses them to directly access resources without verifying that the requesting identity is authorized for that specific object. When Basic Auth is used in an Axum service, the presence of authentication headers does not automatically enforce per-resource authorization, and developers can inadvertently create endpoints where any authenticated user can iterate or manipulate other users' resources.
Consider an Axum handler that extracts a user ID from the path and queries a database to return a profile. If the route uses Basic Auth for identity, the username and password are validated, but the handler may only check that a user is authenticated rather than confirming that the requested profile belongs to that authenticated user. This gap between authentication and authorization means an attacker who knows or guesses another user’s ID can access or modify that resource simply by providing valid Basic Auth credentials for their own account. Common patterns include using sequential integers for user IDs, predictable UUIDs, or resource names that are easy to enumerate.
During a black-box scan, middleBrick tests authentication boundaries and then attempts to access resources with different object references while maintaining the same authenticated session. If the service returns data or different HTTP status codes for valid versus unauthorized object references, this indicates a BOLA/IDOR finding. For example, a request with valid Basic Auth for user A that successfully retrieves user B’s data suggests the endpoint lacks ownership checks. This is particularly risky when the endpoint exposes sensitive information such as email addresses, roles, or internal identifiers, and when the object space is enumerable or predictable.
In Axum, the risk is amplified when routes combine path parameters with query parameters or body inputs that influence data selection. An endpoint like GET /users/{user_id}/settings might validate a session token or Basic Auth header but fail to ensure that the user_id matches the authenticated identity. Because Basic Auth transmits credentials on each request, replay or logging can expose usernames, and without strict per-request ownership validation, attackers may leverage stolen or weak credentials to traverse horizontally across unrelated records.
Real-world attack patterns related to this issue include enumeration of user accounts, unauthorized viewing of personal data, and tampering with shared resources. While not an API-specific vulnerability, OWASP API Security Top 10 API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization describes this class of risk. Proper mitigation requires explicit checks that the authenticated subject owns or is permitted to access the referenced object, and that references cannot be tampered with or guessed.
Basic Auth-Specific Remediation in Axum — concrete code fixes
Remediation focuses on ensuring that every access to a resource validates both the authentication context and the ownership or authorization relationship between the authenticated subject and the requested object. In Axum, this typically means inspecting the authenticated identity from Basic Auth and comparing it explicitly with the resource’s owning identifier before returning or modifying data.
Below are concrete Axum handler examples that demonstrate secure patterns. The first example shows how to parse Basic Auth credentials, extract the username, and enforce that the requested user ID matches the authenticated username.
use axum::{
async_trait, body::Body, extract::FromRequest, http::{request::Parts, StatusCode},
response::IntoResponse, routing::get, Router,
};
use base64::Engine;
use serde::Serialize;
use std::net::SocketAddr;
#[derive(Serialize)]
struct UserProfile {
id: u64,
username: String,
email: String,
}
// A simple in-memory store for demonstration.
struct UserStore;
impl UserStore {
async fn get_by_id(&self, id: u64) -> Option {
// Replace with real database lookup.
Some(UserProfile { id, username: format!("user{}", id), email: format!("user{}@example.com", id) })
}
async fn get_by_username(&self, username: &str) -> Option {
// Replace with real database lookup.
if username.starts_with("user") {
let id = username.trim_start_matches("user").parse::().ok()?;
self.get_by_id(id).ok()
} else {
None
}
}
}
async fn basic_auth_user(request: &Parts) -> Option {
let header_value = request.headers.get("authorization")?;
let header_str = header_value.to_str().ok()?;
if let Some(credentials) = header_str.strip_prefix("Basic ") {
let decoded = base64::engine::general_purpose::STANDARD.decode(credentials).ok()?;
let decoded_str = String::from_utf8(decoded).ok()?;
let mut parts = decoded_str.split(':');
let user = parts.next()?;
// We ignore password for ownership checks; password validation can be added separately.
return Some(user.to_string());
}
None
}
async fn get_user_profile_handler(
store: axum::extract::State,
axum::extract::Path(user_id): axum::extract::Path,
request: axum::extract::Request,
) -> impl IntoResponse {
let user = match basic_auth_user(request.headers()).await {
Some(username) => store.get_by_username(&username).await,
None => None,
};
match user {
Some(profile) if profile.id == user_id => (StatusCode::OK, axum::Json(profile)),
_ => (StatusCode::FORBIDDEN, "Access denied: insufficient permissions".into()),
}
}
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let store = UserStore;
let app = Router::new()
.route("/users/:user_id", get(get_user_profile_handler))
.with_state(store);
let addr = SocketAddr::from(([127, 0, 0, 1], 3000));
axum::Server::bind(&addr)
.serve(app.into_make_service())
.await
.unwrap();
}
This handler retrieves the username from the Basic Auth header and looks up the profile by username, then explicitly checks that the profile’s ID matches the path parameter user_id. If they do not match, it returns a 403 Forbidden response, ensuring that users cannot access other users’ resources simply by changing the path ID.
For scenarios where usernames are not used as identifiers, you can map authenticated identity to a stable user key (such as a database primary key) and perform a join or permission check before serving data. The essential principle is to treat object references as untrusted input and always verify the relationship between the authenticated subject and the referenced resource on each request.
middleBrick’s scans validate these authorization boundaries by probing endpoints with different object references while preserving the same authenticated context. If your Axum service passes Basic Auth but still leaks data across references, remediation should enforce strict ownership checks and avoid exposing internal IDs in predictable forms.
Related CWEs: bolaAuthorization
| CWE ID | Name | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-250 | Execution with Unnecessary Privileges | HIGH |
| CWE-639 | Insecure Direct Object Reference | CRITICAL |
| CWE-732 | Incorrect Permission Assignment | HIGH |