HIGH memory leakfiber

Memory Leak in Fiber

How Memory Leak Manifests in Fiber

Memory leaks in Fiber applications typically occur through improper resource management in request handlers and middleware. A common pattern involves goroutines that never terminate, holding references to request-scoped objects. For example, consider a handler that spawns a goroutine to process data but fails to close the channel:

func leakyHandler(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    ch := make(chan string)
    
    go func() {
        // Simulate processing
        time.Sleep(10 * time.Second)
        ch <- "done"
        // Missing: close(ch)
    }()
    
    // Handler returns before goroutine completes
    return c.SendStatus(fiber.StatusAccepted)
}

Each request creates a new goroutine and channel. Without proper cleanup, these accumulate until the application exhausts available memory. Another Fiber-specific scenario involves middleware that captures context but doesn't release it:

var leakedContexts []fiber.Context

func leakyMiddleware(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    leakedContexts = append(leakedContexts, c)
    return c.Next()
}

This middleware stores every request context indefinitely. Since Fiber contexts contain references to request bodies, query parameters, and headers, this creates a growing memory footprint. Database connection leaks also manifest in Fiber through improper defer usage:

func queryHandler(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    db, err := sql.Open("postgres", dsn)
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }
    // Missing: defer db.Close()
    
    rows, _ := db.Query("SELECT * FROM large_table")
    defer rows.Close()
    
    return c.JSON(fiber.Map{"data": "processed"})
}

Without closing the database connection, each request consumes a new connection from the pool, eventually exhausting resources.

Fiber-Specific Detection

Detecting memory leaks in Fiber requires monitoring goroutine counts and memory allocation patterns. The runtime/pprof package provides built-in profiling tools:

import (
    "runtime/debug"
    "runtime/pprof"
    "os"
)

func setupProfiling() {
    f, _ := os.Create("/tmp/memprofile")
    defer f.Close()
    
    time.AfterFunc(30*time.Second, func() {
        pprof.WriteHeapProfile(f)
        debug.FreeOSMemory()
    })
}

Heap profiles reveal which objects are retaining memory. Look for increasing counts of *fiber.Context, chan, or *sync.Pool objects. The net/http/pprof endpoint works with Fiber when mounted:

import _ "net/http/pprof"

app := fiber.New()

a := app.Group("/debug")
app.Use("/debug/pprof/", http.DefaultServeMux)

Access /debug/pprof/heap to analyze memory usage. For production monitoring, integrate with expvar to track goroutine counts:

import "expvar"

var goroutineCount = expvar.NewInt("goroutine_count")

type statsMiddleware struct{}

func (s *statsMiddleware) Do(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    startGoroutines := runtime.NumGoroutine()
    defer func() {
        current := runtime.NumGoroutine()
        goroutineCount.Set(int64(current - startGoroutines))
    }()
    return c.Next()
}

middleBrick's scanner can detect memory leak patterns by analyzing request handling code and identifying missing cleanup operations. The scanner examines handler functions for unclosed channels, unreleased contexts, and improper defer usage. For Fiber applications, middleBrick specifically checks for:

  • Missing defer c.Context().Request().Body.Close() calls
  • Unbounded goroutine creation without cancellation contexts
  • Middleware that captures and retains request-scoped objects
  • Database operations without proper connection cleanup

Fiber-Specific Remediation

Fixing memory leaks in Fiber requires disciplined resource management. Use context.WithCancel for goroutine lifecycles:

func safeHandler(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(c.Context())
    defer cancel()
    
    ch := make(chan string)
    go func() {
        defer close(ch)
        select {
        case <-ctx.Done():
            return
        case ch <- "processed":
        }
    }()
    
    select {
    case result := <-ch:
        return c.JSON(fiber.Map{"result": result})
    case <-time.After(5 * time.Second):
        return c.Status(fiber.StatusGatewayTimeout).SendString("timeout")
    }
}

This pattern ensures goroutines terminate when the request completes. For middleware, avoid capturing request objects:

func safeMiddleware(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    // Process request without storing context
    return c.Next()
}

// Use sync.Pool for reusable objects
var contextPool = sync.Pool{
    New: func() interface{} {
        return &requestData{}
    },
}

type requestData struct {
    params map[string]string
}

func pooledHandler(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    rd := contextPool.Get().(*requestData)
    defer contextPool.Put(rd)
    
    // Use rd for processing
    return c.Next()
}

Database operations should use connection pooling with proper cleanup:

var db *sql.DB

func init() {
    var err error
    db, err = sql.Open("postgres", dsn)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    db.SetMaxOpenConns(25)
    db.SetConnMaxLifetime(5 * time.Minute)
}

func queryHandler(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    rows, err := db.Query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", c.Params("id"))
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }
    defer rows.Close()
    
    var results []User
    for rows.Next() {
        var u User
        if err := rows.Scan(&u.ID, &u.Name); err != nil {
            return err
        }
        results = append(results, u)
    }
    
    return c.JSON(results)
}

middleBrick's remediation guidance includes specific code patterns for Fiber applications. The scanner identifies problematic code sections and suggests replacements using Fiber's native features like context cancellation, sync.Pool for object reuse, and proper defer patterns. For continuous monitoring, integrate middleBrick's CLI into your deployment pipeline:

middlebrick scan https://api.example.com --profile fiber --fail-on high

This command scans your API endpoints and fails the build if high-severity memory leak issues are detected, preventing vulnerable code from reaching production.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I detect memory leaks in production Fiber applications?
Use pprof endpoints with Fiber's middleware mounting, track goroutine counts with expvar, and analyze heap profiles. middleBrick's scanner can identify leak patterns by examining your codebase for missing cleanup operations and unbounded resource allocation.
What's the difference between a memory leak and high memory usage in Fiber?
High memory usage is temporary and releases when requests complete. Memory leaks involve resources that are allocated but never freed, causing continuous memory growth. middleBrick distinguishes between these by analyzing code patterns: temporary allocations appear in normal operation, while leaks show increasing object counts across requests.