HIGH regex dosfiberhmac signatures

Regex Dos in Fiber with Hmac Signatures

Regex Dos in Fiber with Hmac Signatures — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability

A Regex Denial-of-Service (ReDoS) occurs when a regular expression has overlapping or nested quantifiers on unbounded input, causing catastrophic backtracking. In Fiber, a popular fast HTTP router for Go, this risk is amplified when HMAC signatures are used to validate request authenticity and are processed with vulnerable patterns.

Consider an endpoint that expects an HMAC signature in a header, e.g., X-API-Signature. To verify integrity, the server might parse query parameters or body fields and apply a regex to extract or validate parts of the input before computing the HMAC. If the regex is poorly constructed, an attacker can send crafted data that causes the regex engine to consume excessive CPU time. Because HMAC verification typically occurs before business logic, this creates a denial-of-service vector on the authentication boundary itself.

For example, a common mistake is using a pattern like (a+)+ to validate repeated segments in a token or identifier. When combined with Hmac Signatures in Fiber, an attacker can send a long string of as, causing exponential backtracking during signature validation. The scan checks such patterns across 12 security checks, including Input Validation and Authentication, to flag unsafe regex usage that can degrade performance or block legitimate requests.

In the context of API security scanning, middleBrick detects these patterns by correlating static analysis of route handlers and middleware with runtime behavior. If your OpenAPI spec describes signature validation logic and the implementation uses vulnerable regex, the tool reports this under Authentication and Input Validation findings. This is critical because ReDoS does not require authentication; it is an unauthenticated attack surface that can disrupt availability without credentials.

Real-world CVEs such as CVE-2022-31129 illustrate how regex vulnerabilities in parsing logic can lead to denial-of-service. When Hmac Signatures in Fiber rely on complex string extraction, similar risks emerge if the regex is not linear. The scanner tests for these by analyzing regex constructs and flagging patterns known to cause excessive backtracking, helping teams identify weak points before an attacker exploits them.

Hmac Signatures-Specific Remediation in Fiber — concrete code fixes

To mitigate Regex Dos in Fiber when using Hmac Signatures, focus on simplifying regex patterns, avoiding nested quantifiers, and moving validation logic outside hot paths. Below are concrete, secure code examples for Fiber in Go.

Vulnerable Pattern Example

The following demonstrates a risky approach that can lead to ReDoS:

// DO NOT USE: vulnerable regex with nested quantifiers
re := regexp.MustCompile(`^([a-zA-Z0-9]+)+$`)
func validateInput(input string) bool {
    return re.MatchString(input)
}

Secure Remediation 1: Use Linear Regex

Replace nested quantifiers with a single-level pattern. For Hmac Signatures, which are typically hex or base64, keep validation simple and deterministic:

// Secure: linear regex without backtracking risk
var hexRegex = regexp.MustCompile(`^[a-fA-F0-9]+$`)
var base64Regex = regexp.MustCompile(`^[A-Za-z0-9+/]+=*$`)

func isValidHex(s string) bool {
    return hexRegex.MatchString(s)
}

func isValidBase64(s string) bool {
    return base64Regex.MatchString(s)
}

Secure Remediation 2: Avoid Regex Altogether for Fixed Formats

For Hmac Signatures, prefer length checks and character set validation without regex:

// Secure: no regex, constant-time checks for hex HMAC
func isValidHexNoRegex(s string) bool {
    if len(s) != 64 { // SHA256 hex length
        return false
    }
    for _, c := range s {
        if !(c >= '0' && c <= '9' || c >= 'a' && c <= 'f' || c >= 'A' && c <= 'F') {
            return false
        }
    }
    return true
}

Middleware Integration in Fiber

Apply validation in middleware to protect all routes consistently:

func SignatureValidationMiddleware() fiber.Handler {
    return func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
        sig := c.Get("X-API-Signature")
        if !isValidHexNoRegex(sig) {
            return c.Status(fiber.StatusBadRequest).SendString("invalid signature format")
        }
        // Proceed to HMAC verification using crypto/hmac
        return c.Next()
    }
}

// Attach to routes
app.Post("/webhook", SignatureValidationMiddleware(), func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
    // Handle request after safe validation
    return c.SendString("ok")
})

Additional Guidance

  • Keep regex patterns flat: avoid (...)+ or (a|aa)*.
  • Use standard library tools like regexp with caution; consider linear alternatives.
  • In CI/CD, integrate middleBrick to flag unsafe regex patterns in your OpenAPI specs and source code, especially around authentication and Hmac Signatures in Fiber implementations.

Related CWEs: inputValidation

CWE IDNameSeverity
CWE-20Improper Input Validation HIGH
CWE-22Path Traversal HIGH
CWE-74Injection CRITICAL
CWE-77Command Injection CRITICAL
CWE-78OS Command Injection CRITICAL
CWE-79Cross-site Scripting (XSS) HIGH
CWE-89SQL Injection CRITICAL
CWE-90LDAP Injection HIGH
CWE-91XML Injection HIGH
CWE-94Code Injection CRITICAL

Frequently Asked Questions

How can I test my Fiber routes for Regex Dos using middleBrick?
Run middleBrick scans against your API endpoint to detect vulnerable regex patterns in authentication and input validation. The scanner correlates OpenAPI specs with runtime behavior and reports findings under Authentication and Input Validation without requiring credentials.
Does middleBrick fix Regex Dos in Fiber Hmac Signatures?
middleBrick detects and reports Regex Dos with remediation guidance. It does not automatically fix code; developers must apply secure patterns, such as linear regex or character set checks, in Fiber middleware handling Hmac Signatures.