Xss Cross Site Scripting in Buffalo
How XSS Cross Site Scripting Manifests in Buffalo
Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in Buffalo applications typically arise from improper handling of user input in template rendering and API responses. Buffalo's default template engine, Plush, provides automatic HTML escaping, but developers can inadvertently bypass these protections through several common patterns.
The most frequent XSS vector in Buffalo occurs when developers use the raw helper to bypass HTML escaping. Consider this vulnerable Buffalo action:
func CommentCreate(c buffalo.Context) error {
comment := &models.Comment{}
if err := c.Bind(comment); err != nil {
return err
}
// Vulnerable: raw content rendered without escaping
c.Set("comment", comment)
return c.Render(200, r.HTML("comments/show.plush.html"))
}In the corresponding Plush template, using raw on user-controlled data creates an immediate XSS vulnerability:
<div class="comment">
<p>${raw(comment.Content)}</p>
</div>Another Buffalo-specific pattern involves dynamic JavaScript generation. When Buffalo actions return JSON that includes user input, developers sometimes construct client-side scripts without proper sanitization:
func UserProfile(c buffalo.Context) error {
user := &models.User{}
// Fetch user data...
// Vulnerable: user input embedded in JavaScript without escaping
return c.Render(200, r.JSON(map[string]interface{}{
"script": fmt.Sprintf("var userId = '%s';", user.Username),
}))
}Buffalo's asset pipeline can also introduce XSS risks when processing user uploads. If file names or metadata from user uploads are reflected in HTML without validation, attackers can craft filenames containing malicious scripts.
Form submissions in Buffalo applications are another common attack surface. When using buffalo.NewForm with user-controlled field names or when dynamically generating form elements based on database content, developers must ensure proper escaping is maintained throughout the rendering pipeline.
Buffalo-Specific Detection
Detecting XSS vulnerabilities in Buffalo applications requires both static analysis and dynamic testing. For static analysis, middleBrick's OpenAPI/Swagger spec analysis can identify endpoints that accept HTML or JavaScript content without proper validation constraints.
Dynamic scanning with middleBrick specifically tests Buffalo applications by submitting payloads through all HTTP methods and analyzing responses for reflected XSS. The scanner tests common XSS patterns including:
- Script tags with alert or console.log payloads
- Event handler attributes (onload, onerror, onclick)
- JavaScript pseudo-protocols (javascript:)
- SVG and MathML elements with script content
- JSONP callback injection
For Buffalo applications, middleBrick's black-box scanning approach is particularly effective because it tests the actual running application without requiring source code access. The scanner submits payloads to your Buffalo API endpoints and analyzes the returned HTML/JavaScript for successful script execution.
Buffalo developers can also perform manual testing by using tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite to intercept requests and responses. Pay special attention to endpoints that:
- Accept HTML content in request bodies
- Reflect query parameters in responses
- Process file uploads and display metadata
- Generate dynamic JavaScript based on user input
The middleBrick CLI provides a quick way to scan your Buffalo application during development:
middlebrick scan http://localhost:3000/api/comments
middlebrick scan http://localhost:3000/api/users
middlebrick scan http://localhost:3000/api/uploadEach scan takes 5-15 seconds and returns a security risk score with specific findings about XSS vulnerabilities, including the exact request/response pairs that demonstrated the vulnerability.
Buffalo-Specific Remediation
Buffalo provides several native mechanisms to prevent XSS vulnerabilities. The most fundamental defense is proper use of Plush's automatic HTML escaping. Instead of using raw, always let Plush handle escaping:
<div class="comment">
<p>${comment.Content}</p>
</div>When you need to display user-generated content that might contain HTML, use Buffalo's built-in sanitization middleware. Install the github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday package and create a sanitizer:
import "github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday"
var sanitizer = bluemonday.UGCPolicy()
func CommentCreate(c buffalo.Context) error {
comment := &models.Comment{}
if err := c.Bind(comment); err != nil {
return err
}
// Sanitize content before saving
comment.Content = sanitizer.Sanitize(comment.Content)
tx := c.Value("tx").(*pop.Connection)
err := tx.Create(comment)
if err != nil {
return c.Error(500, err)
}
c.Set("comment", comment)
return c.Render(200, r.HTML("comments/show.plush.html"))
}For JSON responses that include user data, ensure proper escaping when generating JavaScript:
func UserProfile(c buffalo.Context) error {
user := &models.User{}
// Fetch user data...
// Safe: use JSON.Marshal to properly escape content
userData, _ := json.Marshal(user.Username)
return c.Render(200, r.JSON(map[string]interface{}{
"script": fmt.Sprintf("var userId = %s;", userData),
}))
}Buffalo's form handling also provides XSS protection when used correctly. Always use buffalo.NewForm with struct tags rather than manually constructing form elements:
func EditUser(c buffalo.Context) error {
user := &models.User{}
// Fetch user data...
form := buffalo.NewForm(user, "user")
c.Set("form", form)
return c.Render(200, r.HTML("users/edit.plush.html"))
}In your Plush template, this automatically escapes all field values:
<form>
${form.InputTag("Name")}
${form.InputTag("Email")}
${form.InputTag("Bio")}
</form>For file uploads, validate and sanitize file names before displaying them. Create a helper function to escape file metadata:
func sanitizeFilename(name string) string {
return html.EscapeString(filepath.Base(name))
}
// In your template:
<span>Uploaded: ${sanitizeFilename(upload.Filename)}</span>Related CWEs: inputValidation
| CWE ID | Name | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation | HIGH |
| CWE-22 | Path Traversal | HIGH |
| CWE-74 | Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-77 | Command Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-78 | OS Command Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-79 | Cross-site Scripting (XSS) | HIGH |
| CWE-89 | SQL Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-90 | LDAP Injection | HIGH |
| CWE-91 | XML Injection | HIGH |
| CWE-94 | Code Injection | CRITICAL |